Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
09 February 2010 | 13:53 GMT


HOME | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES | PODCASTS | VIDEO DIARIES

Granger says IBA will take control of iSoft within week

Tags: Cerner   CfH   CSC   Germany   Granger   IBA   iS   iSoft   Lorenzo   Millennium   NPfIT   Solution  

14 Jun 2007

Richard Granger, chief executive of Connecting for Health, has inidacted that IBA Health will have control of iSoft within the next week.

However, Granger also warned that he was prepared to ditch iSoft's Lorenzo software, and make arch rival Cerner's Millennium the national system across England, if the late-running software doesn't work or meet NHS requirements.

Speaking after giving evidence to the Commons Health Select Committee Granger said that he had been in consultation with iSoft’s executive chairman, John Weston, and was confident a deal would be finalised by next week.

“I understand that the IBA/iSoft takeover deal is near completion an announcement is due in the next few working days,” he said.

During the committee hearing Granger said that there was ‘a lot of speculation regarding corporate structures that was nearing an end’ regarding iSoft.

Granger was being asked about the suitability of the Lorenzo solution when he offered the assurance about iSoft’s role as a sub-contractor to the National Programme for IT.

He admitted to the committee that he had put in place a team of CfH people in India to work on developing the late-running solution should CSC not agree terms with IBA.

“We have a third party presence in Chennai on a step in basis forcing CSC to step up to the bat for the NHS.”

He added that an initial version of Lorenzo was set for release in Germany very shortly. “We expect within the next couple of weeks to see the first live running of Lorenzo version three to be running in Germany. The NHS will follow next year.”

He told the Committee that if the new iSoft Lorenzo system requires extensive further work after release, CfH may look at making Cerner Millennium the national patient administration system for England, though this was far from ideal, given that NPfIT had set out to avoid a single supplier procurement.

“We have strong foundations to build on. There is a possibility to implement Millennium instead of iSoft. We have dealt with supplier failure, for example Picture Archiving and Communications Systems in the North West and West Midlands, where ComMedica missed nine key milestones and was subsequently replaced by GE.”

The NHS IT boss added that he fully expected there to be teething problems with the Lorenzo system when it is introduced in the UK – now due to happen in 2008.

“I expect there will be difficulties in early sites which will be worked on; and in the last part of 2008, it will rolled out to other sites.”

Granger's comments came the same day iSoft issued the details of IBA's offer to shareholders, recommended by the iSoft board. The iSoft statement says: "iSoft is now engaged in constructive discussions with CSC in relation to the commercial arrangements under which CSC would would take a greater role in the management of iSoft's work on the National Programme for IT and iSoft also continues to seek CSC's consent to the change of control in iSoft." 

© 2007 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Readers Comments
Add a comment
Readers Comments

1

What is Mr Granger doing?

14 Jun 07 15:16

Is it just me that's wondering why Mr Granger is involving himeslf in the iSoft/CSC/IBA issue?

I thought the Contracts were between CfH and the LSPs, so what does it matter who is the owner of the solutions provided? And what does it matter which LSP sub-contractor provides the solution, provided it meets the requirements detailed in the CfH contract with the LSP? For all the end-user cares, it could be Joe Soap knocking up the code in his spare bedroom.

Perhaps Mr Granger should be concentrating on getting the LSPs to deliver what they were contracted to deliver, irrespective of the LSPs' sub-contractors, and irrespective of who owns their sub-contractors.

The article suggests that if - whoever eventually owns the company - the iSoft Lorenzo product 'requires extensive further extensive work after release, then CfH may look at making Cerner Millenium the national Patient Adminstration for England'.

Does this mean that CfH will contract direct with Cerner? Let's not forget that Cerner was among the companies which bid to become an LSP in their own right, but failed to win a contract; also that they weren't even a sub-contractor for any of the LSPs which won contracts. Instead, they were levered in when IDX were deemed unable to deliver.

That's not to say that Cerner isn't a credible option; and if they are, and Mr Granger decides that they should be the sole PAS supplier to the NHS (or even for part of it), then perhaps he should also consider cutting out the middle man, and making Cerner an LSP in its own right?


2

CSC's decision

14 Jun 07 15:31

Surely it is upto CSC what system they deploy - something that we have been told on numerous occasions by CFH - or are we about to see another shift in the goalposts!!


3

Disingenuous

14 Jun 07 17:30

Saying "IDX were deemed unable to deliver" is a long way from the truth, I was there.

GE (after taking over IDX) deemed it too costly and risky to be associated with a failing programme with little realistic monetary gain (after paying huge re-development costs) whilst they were developing their flagship product for US customers (Carecast/Centricity Enterprise v6).


4

Would the FSA be interested?

14 Jun 07 19:50

I am not sure that it is down to Mr Granger to make market-sensitive comments like this. Certainly if either iSoft or IBA made such comments the FSA would have them over a barrel. This sounds like 'Commercial in Confidence' material.


5

Granger says ... Granger says ....

colin@clinformation.com

14 Jun 07 23:30

It'd be nice to see two articles on an EHI page starting with "Granger delivers ..."


6

Help!

15 Jun 07 20:19

It is not reassuring to sites who hve recently deployed any CSC/Accenture software to hear that they may have to move to Millenium. The migration of data into iPM is agony and to think of now having to migrate it into a totally different system is making me suicidal. The thought of training users and all the associated business changes will ensure that I leave the NHS before any change.


7

RE: Granger says ... Granger says ....

17 Jun 07 12:06

RE: " Granger says ... Granger says ....

It'd be nice to see two articles on an EHI page starting with "Granger delivers ..."

You'll have to make do with the page on "Granger to leave in transition by end of 2007" :-

http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/item.cfm?ID=2784


8

Re: Re: Granger says .... Granger says....

colin@clinformation.com

18 Jun 07 09:19

We'll be hearing next that Mr Granger is going to deliver a "transition"!


9

don't call it slippage!

22 Jun 07 21:27

Was he referring to a CFH week when he made this bold statement?

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
Most commented
Most commented
Tags
Tags
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters