Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
09 September 2010 | 08:37 GMT


HOME | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | AWARDS | PODCASTS | VIDEOS
View reders comments View (3)
comments
Add a comment Add a
comment
Send to a friend Send to
a friend
Print this page Print

New IT local delivery plans due by September

Tags: A   Bacon   CfH   Community   DH   England   Information   iS   SHA   Strategic  

03 Aug 2005

Implementation of new NHS IT systems is to become a non-negotiable part of the local delivery plans (LDPs) of every trust and strategic health authority. Each local health community in England is required to submit a new integrated delivery plan by September.

The new arrangements mean that NHS organisations will now have to give very clear commitments to when they will take new systems from the NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT) or risk being penalised, while SHAs will have an increased role to play in policing adoption of new systems.

All NHS Chief Information Officers and service modernisation directors have been written to by John Bacon and Richard Jeavons, the DH's directors of Programmes and Performance and IT Services Implementation respectively, setting out how their organisations will be performance managed on the adoption of new systems.

In a 21 June DH letter Duncan Selbie and Jeavons state: "We are linking this work with the Finance Group that Top Team [SHA CEOs] have established to look at agreeing LDPs and delivering financial balance. We anticipate that the same linkages will be made locally."

In a July interview with E-Health Insider Jeavons commented: "The guidance sets out how we will pull the implementation planning of this programme into the mainstream of local delivery planning."

Step one will require all local health communities develop an integrated Service Improvement Plan (ISIP) which SHAs should sign off by 30 September. This new plan is intended to "outline the LHC’s joint objectives for next 3 years, key enabling workforce, modernisation, finance and IM&T solutions and planned impact on performance".

The second stage of the new planning process says that by the end of March 2006 all local health communities will be required to have reviewed and updated their Service Improvement Plan. This will be based on a new framework due to be issued by Connecting for Health in October.

Because local health communities are not statutory organisations each organisation providing NHS services within in a local health community will have to individually sign off the local integrated Service Improvement Plan.

Jeavons told EHI: “Between October and March all organisations in each SHA area will be asked to complete, as part of their local delivery plan, an implementation plan for the national programme setting out what IT deployment opportunities they want to take, in what order, with what prospective benefits, as part of their overall improvement plan and local delivery plan.”

Link

Bringing CfH into the mainstream

© 2005 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Readers Comments
Add a comment
Readers Comments

1

Great idea but can CfH deliver?

david.pearson@nhs.net

04 Aug 05 16:16

Fully support any move to a joined up Service Improvement plan for Health Communities. Guidance i have seen so far does not suggest this will be as joined up as we all hope it will be. Will service improvers really be checking that either CfH or local solutions can deliver the required technology to support the service change and if there are delays in CfH delivery will the service change not take place?

I also can not see how large acute Trusts can sign up to plans when we still can not get enough detail as to what is available when to replcae current functionality let alone new functionality.


2

They *will* be busy! ;->>>

mary.hawking@nhs.net

04 Aug 05 21:44

This sounds like a major change in requirements for SHAs and PCTs - announcement in ? June 2005, to be completed by 30th September and to have reviewed and updated the Service Improvement Plan (on a framework to be issued in October by CfH) and have an implementation plan including data from the LSPs not yet available - and untested solutions - by March next year. The private sector *must* be super efficient. I thought the CfH realised that the NHS exists in the UK - and not on planet Zog: not sure about private corporations. Conspiracy or cock-up?


3

Trusts are waiting too

05 Aug 05 09:07

The article reads rather as if it is the local NHS and PCTs that are dragging their heals. I am not at all sure this is the case.

We (an acute trust with HISS and full integrated departmentals) are fully signed up to the NPfIT (committed from the board down). Working well with our health community we did all the preparation work required, schedules, funding, recruitment, data cleaning, etc, some time ago. But we are still waiting at the bus stop for the P1R2 to arrive, it doesn't even seem to be on the timetable yet.

But even when the P1R2 does come, it can't take us to our destination, it just replaces the vehicle we currently use. What is needed is the full "level 6 EPR" functionality of the P2 products and, given the increasing clinical and business pressures we face, we need across the whole Health Community as soon as possible. I can fully appreciate the contractual reasons why the LSP needs to deliver PAS (though not why it should take so long for such a basic well established system) but this priority should not at the expense of following products. PAS may the start for some but for many it's the P2 products that will deliver the ISIP benefits.

Please don't read this as a rant against the NPfIT, far from it, the programme is exactly what the NHS needs, but it needs to get back on track and start delivering innovative products fit for purpose and usable now.

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
EHI Tweets HIMSS10’
EHI Tweets HIMSS10’
Most commented
Most commented
Tags
Tags
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters