Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
29 July 2010 | 20:29 GMT


HOME | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | AWARDS | PODCASTS | VIDEOS
View reders comments View (10)
comments
Add a comment Add a
comment
Send to a friend Send to
a friend
Print this page Print

Toolkit to nail interoperability - Jones

Tags: A   CfH   Christine Connelly   Data   Information   Intellect   Interoperability   Interoperability toolkit   iS   Oracle   Paul Jones   Standards   Toolkit  

29 Oct 2009

The new NHS interoperability toolkit has the potential to drive down the cost of interoperability and innovation, according to the Department of Health’s chief technology officer.

In an exclusive interview with E-Health Insider, Paul Jones said the first cut of the toolkit – based on ‘about’ 22 messaging standards plus guidance - has the potential to open up the NHS IT market to new players, ranging from hospital IT departments to industry giants like Oracle and SAP.

The first ‘layer’ of the toolkit – a set of interoperability standards - was released to suppliers through Intellect last month. It will be piloted at a couple of NHS sites. The fully fledged toolkit has been promised by director of informatics Christine Connelly by next March.

Jones said the toolkit was about “layering new functionality on core systems more quickly than would otherwise be possible” and that the initiative delivered the clearest possible message that NHS Connecting for Health stood full- square behind interoperability.

“Can we reduce the cost of interoperability and reduce the costs of innovation? I think we can,” he said. “The idea is to open up the functionality and data we have in the main LSP applications. It will allow niche guys to develop niche applications.”

Jones says the response from suppliers has been very positive. “Suppliers want standards.” The hope is that common interoperability standards will enable trusts and developers to develop discrete applications that will run on top of the nationally procured Lorenzo and Millennium CRS systems.

Because they will use nationally defined interoperability standards, NHS hospitals should be able to use new toolkit-based applications quickly and without the expense and time of bespoke local integration. This would also avoid the need to repeatedly go through the DH’s National Integration Centre.

Jones pointed to appointment reminders as one example. “Lorenzo does not come with SMS appointment reminders. We could put it on the list with CSC, but it would go onto a pretty long priority list. So someone else would provide an application that would do that.”

New applications and modules could come from suppliers and from the NHS, where good in-house development teams remain. Jones pointed to two examples: “Steve Fairclough at Morecambe Bay runs a good shop, and King’s has developed some good iSoft modules that are used by other hospitals.”

As well as clearing the path for new niche applications, the twin aim is to open up data in local service provider applications; almost virgin territory area for imaginative new services. “Do I know how the market will use that data?” Jones asked. “No I don’t. But I do want people to innovate.”

The CTO hopes that lowering the bar on interoperability will also make the NHS market more attractive to highly capable new players. “We hope it will open the door to some of the big players not currently involved, like SAP and Oracle. If we could make the environment look more homogenous to these kinds of players it could make the market more open.”

The trick, he acknowledged, will be to square the new emphasis on interoperability and innovation with the realities of the LSP contracts, and the strategic systems bought from their two main suppliers.

Jones said he deliberately steered away from using the ‘app store’ label for the toolkit. Anyone expecting an explosion of simple, Apple iPhone-style clinical applications is going to be sorely disappointed. “Everyone gets the idea, but an iPhone is less complex than a district general hospital,” Jones said.

Jones also said he expects some changes to the toolkit messaging standards, based on feedback from the NHS and suppliers. He said the March deadline is about showing this can be done. “But for now it’s about publishing standards and getting suppliers to open up the APIs [Application Programming Interfaces].”

Enquiries about the toolkit should be directed to toolkit.enquiries@nhs.net

Link

Link to toolkit

More information on the NHS Interoperability toolkit is available via the NHS Connecting for Health Terminology Reference Data Update Distribution Service. www.uktcregistration.nss.cfh.nhs.uk

Jon Hoeksma

Related Articles
Related Articles

© 2009 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Readers Comments
Add a comment
Readers Comments

1

great idea

29 Oct 09 15:20

pity it took 5 years to work out that this was the way to go. Still better late than never as my old mum used to say


2

Great News

30 Oct 09 08:10

No, really, this is great news for vendors. Does anyone know where we can get further details?


3

A move in the right direction

vicky.price@eastmidlands.nhs.uk

30 Oct 09 09:52

Really good to see this happening (at last!). Definately the best way to deliver tailored functionality that can integrate with standard applications.


4

Intellect member access only :-(

30 Oct 09 09:57

The package is downloadable from the Intellect web site

http://www.intellectuk.org/content/view/5453/47/

However it is available to Intellect members only.  Since this is presumably a limited preview release this may be excusable.

However even the introductory presentation pdf file is withheld from non-members. So what those "22 messaging standards" might be or relate to presumably remains a mystery to the wider NHS IT community.

Meanwhile both the NPfIT Message Implementation Manuals and the [embryonic] Logical Record Architecture artifacts are released via the well known (and free to register) TRUD mechanism  https://www.uktcregistration.nss.cfh.nhs.uk/trud/ 

One hopes these inevitably partially overlapping new standards are better integrated than their distribution currently is.

 


5

New standards???

30 Oct 09 10:09

A couple of questions.

1. Are these new "standards" different from SNOMED-CT, dm+d, HL7v3, CUI and openEHR data entry templates?

2. Will the new toolkit be an open source product, written in an "open source language" - Java / Python etc - which will be available for any healthcare software supplier to download and use free of charge?

 


6

20 years on ...

30 Oct 09 12:06

Isn't this what IMG was working on back in 1989?


7

Why oh why are public standards for a public institution never actually public?

30 Oct 09 17:00

Why oh why are public standards for a public institution never actually public?

I work for a small software house in the UK that writes software for use in UK hospitals.

I have no idea if this toolkit is of interest to us - and to even look at the documentation we have to pay £980 to join yet another organisation that I haven't even heard of until this story.

Why is all this information kept behind locked doors? Why is is so difficult to even find that it exists?

Just to track it all is a fulltime job - but as a small company we can't afford the luxury of spending all our time looking.

The whole process is geared towards the "Big guys", who promise lots but deliver nothing - and successfully take the business away from smaller companies.


8

sadly..

01 Nov 09 12:20

..the big guys were themselves once small guys but most forget where they came from and generally now act as if there are only big guys around.

The people that only work with the big guys tend to believe the oft touted message that biggest is best, probably don't even know that the big guys were once small guys and sometimes enjoy the  association of working with the big guys (reflected) a little too much! - the true professionals do the right thing whether that is with a big company or a small company.

Interoperability should allow a pool of all the talents to thrive - let's see how serious this effort is.


9

Share with the NHS

01 Nov 09 22:09

Radical idea. Why doesn't the NHS publish these standards instead of pushing them out via a closed door ?

I have heard of Intellect, a supplier organisation, I've also tried to access the HL7 standards -HL7UK also is open to suppliers by subscription.

I am dubious about the ease with which interoperability can truly "be nailed", good integration is a complex dance between the two systems amd suppliers, but the fundamentals are quite simple. But as with so much in this intellectually impoverished and morally corrupt country, these things were created at public expense, yet we public servants are supposed to mandate, procure and implement without easy access.

If CfH (or whatever they call themselves now) valued staff working in the wider NHS perhaps they would gain more respect, and find the costs will drop.

 


10

Very Positive Progress

04 Nov 09 18:04

Agree this is a very positive direction. And, utilizing open source tools such as Mirth would further stimulate innovation and build a community of developers that can layer niche apps on top of the larger applications like Lorenzo.

Are there online forums in the UK that are discussing and comparing notes on these initiatives?  It would be good to compare notes and share knowledge to create a groundswell of progress with interoperability.

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
EHI Tweets HIMSS10’
EHI Tweets HIMSS10’
Most commented
Most commented
Tags
Tags
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters