Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register? |
Newsletter RSS Twitter
19 March 2010 | 10:51 GMT


HOME | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | AWARDS | PODCASTS | VIDEO DIARIES

Royal Berkshire selects UPMC for Cerner

Tags: A   Alcatel   Cerner   CRS   emergency   EPR   Foundation Trust   Fujitsu   Information   iS   LSP   Meditech   Millennium   Newcastle   NPfIT   Rotherham   Solution   South   Strategic   Tender   UPMC  

10 Jun 2009

Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust has selected University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre as its preferred partner to deliver a new electronic patient record system.

The new Cerner system will be implemented outside of the National Programme for IT in the NHS, through a joint venture with UPMC that will develop new service delivery models at the foundation trust.

The trust declined to confirm that it had selected a preferred supplier. However, Nancy Landman, the chief information officer of UPMC, told E-Health Insider: “Yes, we have received notice that we are preferred vendor and are now in an Alcatel period.”

Alcatel is a period of at least ten calendar days following the notification of an award decision in a contract tendered via the Official Journal of the European Union, before the contract is signed with the successful supplier.

Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust follows a path first taken by Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, which in April 2008 signed a similar deal with UPMC.

The Newcastle deal covered providing the trust with a Cerner Millennium EPR, including inpatient order entry, patient administration, pharmacy management, accident and emergency services and operating room systems.

In June 2008, the chairman of Royal Berkshire revealed that the trust was looking outside the national programme, to ensure it gets the IT systems required. The move was driven by lengthy delays in the NPfIT programme in the South, culminating in the exit of local service provider Fujitsu last May.

Speaking last May, trust chairman Colin MacLean said: “Plan A was to try to work with the national programme, Plan B was to start propping up our own IT systems and to continue working with the national programme, and just over six months ago we were made aware that we needed to start thinking about a Plan C to go out on our own.”

Legal advice taken by the trust and the local strategic health authority concluded that following the termination of Fujitsu’s LSP contract “there was no longer considered to be a Southern Connecting for Health Programme for IT and, therefore, no contract and no loss to the NHS should Trusts implement their own systems."

Trust board papers stated, “At the June Board meeting it was agreed, in principle, that the trust would invest in IT outside the national programme.

"The Trust had concluded that a Cerner solution would be the most appropriate way forward. However, Cerner did not wish to supply systems directly to the trust. Therefore, the only option available to the trust was to seek a strategic partner to supply, develop and implement the Cerner systems.”

As a result, in August the trust placed an advert in the Official Journal of the European Union for a new EPR system. The tender document specified the need for a full EPR system, over a seven year period, able to integrate with existing trust systems.

In February of this year, Royal Berkshire entered into an exclusive negotiation period with UPMC designed to progress “the strategic partnership” between the two.

Although the value of the Royal Berkshire contract is unknown, Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust recently awarded Meditech a contract for similar services and systems valued at £30-40m over ten years.

Trust board papers from Royal Berkshire show that contingency planning for delays to the NPfIT CRS were begun in January 2007, when the trust was also suffering significant delays. It had hoped to begin implementation by November 2007 at the latest.

In May BT, the LSP for London, was awarded a £500m contract extension for supporting eight existing Cerner sites in the South and putting the system into four more.

Related articles

Rotherham picks Meditech for EPR

Foundation trusts tender outside NPfIT

Newcastle chooses Pittsburgh for EHR

Royal Berkshire 'may walk' from NHS IT programme

Jon Hoeksma

© 2009 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Readers Comments
Add a comment
Readers Comments

1

Newcastle

11 Jun 09 07:45

All eyes on Newcastle for their UPMC/Cerner go-live in August then...


2

Herding cats

brian.hogan@live.co.uk

15 Jun 09 10:34

I am more than a little confused by this story. I wonder what are the compelling differences between Millenium as anticipated in Royal Berks and Millenium now installed at Barts and the Royal Free? Surely if all that was needed was some additional functionality then an arrangement could have been made with CFH where Berks merely paid for the add-ons and avoided shelling out their own funds for the whole system? I wonder if they spoke to other Cerner users to pool ideas? Newcastle doesn't count because they don't have a system yet but many others do. The second major thing I don't understand is the OJEU process. Cerner "did not want to supply directly" - but they have had a partnership with UPMC for 3 years (UPMC website) so they are hardly disconnected. So the OJEU was about ""finding a strategic partner to supply, develop and implement Cerner" -  doesn't BT do that in partnership with Cerner? And despite having decided on Cerner were other product suppliers invited to tender and waste time and money? And since Cerner has announced redundancies in the UK will we now be importing product specialists from Pennsylvania to implement a system for the NHS? What a pity that Trusts don't seem to want to work together. I feel sorry for CFH - it must be like herding cats.

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
EHI Tweets HIMSS10’
EHI Tweets HIMSS10’
Most commented
Most commented
Tags
Tags
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters