Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register?
HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | COMMENT & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES | FORUMS

London payroll and Tees patient records lost

17 Sep 2008

Four computer disks, containing more than seven years' worth of payroll information for nearly 18,000 NHS staff in London, have been lost in the post.

The disks disappeared in July after the Whittington Hospital NHS Trust’s payroll department sent them to McKesson, which provides it with payroll IT services.

The disks were sent via the postal system. A question and answer list provided by the trust says its standard practice is to send “any such information” by courier.

An envelope containing the disks was put into a post tray marked “recorded delivery” on 22 July. The Q&A says there is no record of the disks being sent, so they are “missing, presumed lost”. An investigation is under way into why the loss was not reported up the organisation until the start of September.

The disks were being sent to McKesson for its archives. They contained the name, date of birth, national insurance number, start date, pay details and sickness record of 17,990 staff who worked at the Whittington, Camden Primary Care Trust, Islington Primary Care Trust, and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust since April 2001.

The Whittington’s payroll department administers the wages and salaries of all these organisations. More than 5,000 staff addresses for the current financial year were also on the disks. The trust is adamant however, that no bank details were on them.

The trust also says that the disks were all protected by alpha-numeric passwords and that “unless found by expert hackers, [these] are very difficult to break."

David Sloman, the trust’s chief executive, has apologised to the staff involved. Dedicated email contact points have been set up to deal with their queries. Meanwhile, the police have been informed and a member of staff has been suspended.

The Q&A says the trust audited its data transfer systems in January, in line with the Department of Health’s instructions following HMRC’s loss of two unsecured disks holding the details of 25 million child benefit claimants in the post at the end of last year.

It says the trust’s data transfer systems have been re-audited in the past week and it is satisfied that “this was a one-off breach of its procedures. Whittington is commissioning an independent review of its information governance systems “to give us further reassurance that they are robust.”

The London trust is not the only NHS organisation to have been forced to admit a data breach this week. A memory stick containing confidential patient information from Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust was found by a member of the public in Barnard Castle in County Durham.

Managers at the mental health and learning disabilities trust have confirmed that the electronic storage device was lost by a computer technician, who had been upgrading PCs in Teesdale and Weardale and had failed to delete the data from the memory stick.

The trust has launched a full investigation into the incident and is in the process of contacting the 200 service users whose personal information was on the device.

It says early investigations have also confirmed that a number of staff have stored confidential data on their hard drives - contravening trust policies on information security.

Chief executive Martin Barkley said: “Safeguarding patients’ confidential information is of the utmost importance to the trust and we have clear policies and procedures in place to support this.

“There has been a serious breach of these policies and of patient confidentiality. We are very sorry this has happened but grateful that it has been brought to our attention.”

The trust has written to all staff to remind them of their responsibility to safeguard patient information and to follow trust procedure.

He said: “We now need to complete the investigation so that we can learn from this isolated incident and put measures in place to prevent it from happening again.”

 

Simona Stankovska

© 2008 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

1

"we are very sorry..."

cpoee1@yahoo.com

17 Sep 08 04:21

This site has reported enumerable breaches in protected information. The kneejerk response is "we are sorry...". That was easy...but instead of an apology and a year of free credit surveillance, should there not be an assembly of an aggregate of all breaches that have occurred in this IT Horlicks in the interest of transparency?

That such violations continue to occur raise the spectre that the widespread deployment of such unvetted IT systems (HIT and other) is a social experiment gone bad. Have the risks and benefits been ascertained? Will people sign consent to participate if they knew their was a risk that their private data may be breached?

Cepi


2

One should not laugh - but.....

17 Sep 08 15:04

I'm a hard-liner when it comes to this continuing fiasco surrounding personal data and security (or lack of)......only a few weeks back I was chatting with and NHS employee who thought I was being "too hard" on those who display what appears to be a complete disregard for personal data security.

Guess what? That persons personal data is amongst that lost.

One should not laugh - but in this case I'm afraid I will.


3

Hearts and minds

17 Sep 08 15:12

All of the push from the centre has been around technology - encryption, port blocking, central purchase of software etc.

What is required is hearts and minds campaign as time after time it is not technology but people who are causing breaches in data security.

This topic needs to move from the 'e' community to the general and clinical management community.

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters