Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register?
HOME | CONTACT | NEWS | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | OPINION & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES | POLLS | PODCASTS

Infrastructure gap between NHS trusts growing

Tags: CfH   Informatics   South  

22 Apr 2008


The gap between the best and the worst NHS trusts on the effectiveness of their IT infrastructure and operations is growing, with the poorest performers failing to keep up with best practice.

Mark Ferrar, Connecting for Health’s director of infrastructure, said at Healthcare Computing 2008 in Harrogate today that while some NHS organisations were investing in modern IT infrastructure, comparable to the benchmark being set in other sectors, others are failing to invest and lagging behind.

“The gap between the best and the worst is widening. The best are getting better and those not as mature are staying still.”

Ferrar said the maturity of infrastructure and associated IT operations, varied widely. “It’s good in some areas and bad in others.”

The CfH infrastructure director said that of the estimated £2.2bn - £2.3bn annual IT spend within the NHS, some 70% was accounted for by infrastructure. “That’s £1.54 spent annually on infrastructure and operations.”

Ferrar said this was not always being translated into giving staff modern PCs and tools to do their jobs, “One unnamed trust IT manager proudly told me he was getting 11 years out of assets. I felt sorry for his end users.”

He said one of the basic steps trusts need to take is to far better understand how many PCs and software licenses they had. He said that too few even have a complete spreadsheet of such assets, “we generally don’t know what software we have,” said Ferrar.

Similarly, he said there was a more sophisticated view of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of assets, so that trusts could get the best value, rather than lowest cost, and plan for redundancy from the outset. “We don’t know what the total cost of ownership is across the NHS despite being the 800lb gorilla in IT purchasing.”

He said that proper asset management was vital to understanding TCO and enabling the NHS to negotiate the best enterprise licensing deals with key vendors. “I don’t want to have to sit down with Microsoft and say I don’t know how many PCs the NHS has or how many copies of Microsoft Office. So this translates into real money.”

He added that on hardware and PCs the NHS also needed to ensure it got the right deal in what was a fiercely competitive market, and should be better using its purchasing power. “There’s lots of crocodiles in this market and they will bite your hand off, and have been biting our hand off.”

To help NHS organisations plan and improve their infrastructure development CfH has developed the NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model (NIMM), a five-tier model that trusts can benchmark their performance against and prioritise future investments. NIMM draws on best practice research from Gartner, Microsoft and others.

Most NHS organisations currently fall between the first two levels, lagging several years behind the sophistication achieved by other industries where infrastructure has been better integrated and able to support business change and innovation.

Ferrar explained that the aim of the model, each element of which is supported by templates and tools, including self-assessments, is to enable organisations “to play leapfrog up through this process. He said that CfH estimates it will typically take each organisation two to three years to advance fully through each of the five levels.

One important part of the model is a TCO prototype that is now being piloted by Lincolnshire PCT, South Devon Health Informatics Service and Sussex Health Informatics Service.

© 2008 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Readers Comments
Add a comment
Readers Comments

1

How could this possibly be?

22 Apr 08 14:40

A widening gap sounds more like the sort of thing one might expect from a local implementation free-for-all rather than the much vaunted "ruthless standardisation and centralisation" that NPfIT was supposed to deliver!


2

Local cash?

gillsr@iee.org

23 Apr 08 20:44

Oh and how much cash have the local IT depts been given by the National Programme to provide kit & project/change management resources for infrastructure? Yes that's right, nothing, so when PACS for example requires a server room overhaul it comes out of our existing budgets and puts our desktop deployments and many other projects way behind...


3

Master of the bleedin obvious

24 Apr 08 11:32

If we spent a little less money on paying managers in the SHA and DoH to produce an 'NHS Infrastructure Maturity Model ' and a bit more money on service delivery organisations then perhaps we wouldnt have such a problem. The agenda for the IT manager who was happy to get 11 years out of his kit was probably set by his senior managament board. If the hospital is closing wards I'm sure he has been set a remit to save money. This shows how out of touch senior management in the NHS is with what is happening in service provider organisations. Most Trust boards dont give a stuff about NPfIT and fancy 'models'. To steal an expression from a famous USA electioneer, 'Its the economy stupid'. Or better still 'Its PbR stupid'. I think I'll get some T shirts printed.

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
Most commented
Most commented
Most read
Most read
Tags
Tags
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters