Email: Password:   Register | Why Register?
HOME | CONTACT | NEWS ARCHIVE | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | COMMENT & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES | FORUMS

Southern contract reset deadline up

31 Jan 2008

The deadline set for completing the contract reset in the South of England has expired without agreement being reached.

At the beginning of the current reset process, July 31 2007, January was set as the deadline in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between local service provider Fujitsu and the Southern Programme for IT (SPfIT).

However, it was confirmed today by Sarah Elmendorf, the head of SPfIT, that agreement had not been reached by the deadline.

In a 31 January letter seen by E-Health Insider Elmendorf says: “SPfIT Board members in the south of England met on Tuesday 29 January to review the most recent Fujitsu proposal. While some progress has been made on the broad product set, SPfIT Board members reviewed the overall submission and were unable to accept it. As a result, the Memorandum of Understanding that was signed between us and Fujitsu in July 2007 (that started the Contract Reset) will expire on 31 January.”

E-Health Insider understands negotiations have been carried out by a handful of individuals on either side. The biggest stumbling block is understood to be additional resources – to make far-reaching changes to the delivery approach and what is delivered.

While the passing of the MOU-set deadline does not act as an immediate trigger, the existing contract between Fujitsu and CfH remains in place, it highlights just how difficult and protracted the current negotiations have been.

Elemendorf’s letter says: “The extant formal position will therefore be that both parties will revert to the contract as it was prior to the MOU from that point onwards. Nevertheless urgent commercial negotiations are continuing and I hope to be able to report progress shortly.”

One source told EHI the real hard deadline for completion may now be the NHS’s financial year at the end of March – indicating resolution may remain some way off.

As long as negotiations continue, key uncertainties remain for trusts in the South of England, including when they can expect products to become available and what functionality they will provide.

Re-negotiation of the contract has now been underway for the past seven months. A January board paper from South Central SHA, the host body for SPfIT, says: “A process to reset the contract was agreed with the LSP in July. Negotiations with Fujitsu are currently ongoing.”

As EHI reported last week, the direction in the South appears to be towards best of breed applications in areas such as pharmacy, child health and maternity.

Best of breed is the path already taken in London, where BT is to get an extra £55m following its recent contract reset. With Fujitsu being asked for more far-reaching changes the company is understood to be asking for a considerably larger sum in return, thought to be a key sticking point in the current re-negotiations.

 

Jon Hoeksma

© 2008 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

1

Get me off the rollercoaster

31 Jan 08 21:19

Do I feel elated that the Southern cluster have not rolled over and agreed to pay more money for less system ?

Do I feel angry that the chirade continues ?

Well both. There now appears so little joined-up working possible through the LSP solutions to ridicule the alleged benefits of these monopoly outsourced arrangements.

And the existing systems, that were so ignored by the faithful, have kept the administration of NHS organisations going remarkably well, given the lack of investment in them through planning blight.

I think that CfH/LSP arrangements have added massively to delays in delivery, to costs on all sides, and to many wasted years of talented NHS clinicians, technologists and managers time.

I think it is about time for some brave decisions.


2

Not surprising

01 Feb 08 07:30

Not surprising! Trusts in the South want software that is effective and efficient, or even effective or efficient - what we have is inefficient and counter productive, and costly in financial, orgainsation and morale terms.

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters
latest forum posts
latest forum posts