Welcome Guest | Login | Register | Why Register?
HOME | CONTACT | NEWS ARCHIVE | DOCUMENT LIBRARY | FEATURES | COMMENT & ANALYSIS | EVENTS | RESEARCH REPORTS | CASE STUDIES | FORUMS

Medical Tablet PC launched by Intel

22 Feb 2007

Intel, Motion Computing and NHS Connecting for Health have announced the launch of a new mobile computing device, designed from the ground up for use by clinicians in hospital and community environments.

The Mobile Clinical Assistant (MCA) is lightweight rugged tablet PC with a built in carrying handle designed to withstand the knocks and spills of a busy hospital while also being easily disinfected. The device is designed to provide doctors and nurses with access up-to-the-minute patient records and to document a patient’s condition. MCA in use at bedside

Intel says that it has worked with the main leading vendors of electronic patient record systems, including iSoft and Cerner, the leading suppliers to the English NHS, to ensure their systems are compatible with the tablet device.  An iSoft spokesperson told EHI the MCA was compatible with its software "out of the box".

Incorporating Intel's latest wireless technology the MCA features a built-in bar code reader to enable patient wrist bands to be read, a digital camera and an RFID scanner enabling clinical users to be securely identified of drugs to be verified before being given to a patient.

Barcode scanning and RFID should directly help with improved patient identification and safety helping reduce medication errors. Bluetooth connectivity meanwhile will allow the MCA to link to patient diagnostic devices and even a wireless stephascope, which featured on early prototypes.

Intel vice president, Gordon Graylish, assistant general manager EMEA, said the MCA is designed to enable "nurses to spend more time with patients, do their jobs on the move while remaining connected, and manage the administration of medications" Camera in use on MCA

Developed over past three years by Intel, Motion Media and NHS Connecting for Health the MCA is intended to provide clinicians with the information they need at the point of care. The MCA was developed from the ground up based on the requirements set by clinicians, based on ethnographic research.

Prototypes were then tested at three pilot sites in North California, Singapore and at England's Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, where the MCA was used by nurses and phlebotomists.

One of the nurses involved in the Salford pilot was Jenny Quilliam, who said: "The MCA enabled me to have on the spot access for imputing patient details at the bedside. I was able to look up results, check and make referrals as part of the ward round and support case conferences by having quick access to patient details."

Dr Mike Bainbridge, Connecting for Health (CfH) senior clinical architect, told E-Health Insider that MCA would be hugely valuable in both hospitals and patients homes, with GPRS versions planned later this year. "We are looking for this sort of device appearing at a patient's home for a community nurse, and are looking for GPRS ones to become available in Q3 2007."

Dr Bainbridge added: "This device is first of a suite of things that will start to come together in next few months. This catalyses the ability to use RFID and barcode for patient ID and medicine administration so we can start pushing the safety we know can be achieved through use of electronic records."

One of the issues yet to be addressed is providing the security and connectivity required by the National Programme for IT. Salford runs non-CfH versions of iSoft's iPM and iCM systems which don't connect to the spine. During the trial, user authentication was done using staff proximity badges containing RFID chips, rather than the smart cards mandated by CfH. Due to infection control considerations the C5 device doesn't have a smart card reader that would enable staff to use it to access CfH applications.

Dr Bainbridge exclusively revealed to EHI that CfH plans for proximity device cards in late 2007 , that will enable the C5 MCA to connect to the spine. "This directly addresses stuff like Jim Johnson's [chair of the BMA IT committee] concerns over smart cards."

CfH has been involved from the beginning in providing input into the design of the MCA. Graylish singled out the agency for praise for its "clear leadership" in helping define the requirements for the MCA.  He stressed that the MCA offered part of wider infrastructure required for better clinical information use including, wireless networks, security and clinical applications.

Dr Bainbridge concluded: "Knowledge at the point of care is the key to improving patient safety. The mobile clinical assistant represents the culmination of three years' partnership between NHS Connecting for Health and industry to design and deliver tools which match the challenging and complex environment of high quality, personalised 21st century healthcare."

Graylish told EHI that the full requirements list drawn up by clinicians had set Intel's engineers some unique challenges, "such as unlimited battery life" and "weighing nothing", some of which they are still working on.

Although CfH has no immediate plans for a bulk purchase of MCAs,  Dr Bainbridge made clear he personally was convinced of their value: "We're very keen to evaluate and take this step around making sure the log-in and authentication processes for our spine compliant services, having achieved that we are in a position to look at a bulk purchase."

Dr Simon Eccles, one of the clinical leads for NHS CfH added that the cost of the devices needed to be looked at against the time savings they offered to valuable and expensive clinical staff.

The first model of the MCA is the C5 by Motion Media, which is due to ship to the NHS within three months. Unit costs are initially expected to be £1199.

© 2007 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

1

Anti theft

23 Feb 07 09:40

We considered handheld devices for community midwives some time ago and our concern was that the device might get stolen. We have had PC's stolen in the past, so a lightweight handheld device is just asking to be taken. One way to avoid this would be to make them all a bright colour. Thieves would hopefully think twice before stealing them.


2

Disinfection

23 Feb 07 10:25

As hospital-acquired infection is very much in the news at the moment, how long will it take to disinfect this device between every patient who has his/her details "input at the bedside"?


3

Disninfection

23 Feb 07 11:40

".....As hospital-acquired infection is very much in the news at the moment, how long will it take to disinfect this device between every patient who has his/her details "input at the bedside"? ....."

Less time than it takes to disinnfect the traditional keyboard - we ARE cleaning the traditional keyboard - arn't we?


4

NHS IT Guy

23 Feb 07 12:05

I can't help feeling that however small, light, rugged and wipeable these devices get, they are not the ultimate answer. Apart from the problems that have already been pointed out, they still need one hand to hold them and one to operate them (leaving how many?)

My gut feeling is that there are two key technologies that need to be brought to bear on the problem of information retrieval and collection in busy clinical workplaces: firstly, voice and secondly, persistent and device-independent user sessions. Imagine the scenario - a busy clinical workplace with a profusion of wall-mounted screens (but no keyboards). Each detects the approach of a proximity-device-carrying clinician, invokes his or her user session and tunes it into the context of the adjacent patient, who is wearing an RFID wristband. The clinician controls the screen through voice instructions via an audio device, which may double as the proximity device, and which is also capable of communicating, via audio output services, with core information systems - there'd be nothing to hold, nothing to recharge, nothing to wipe and nothing to nick.

I'm sure there are many devils in the detail, but the technological components are all available today. I'm sure that tablets will have a lot of uses, and of course they could have a role in the scenario I outlined above. The mistake is to see them as a solution in isolation of other, more important, technologies.


5

Re: Disinfection

colin@clinformation.com

23 Feb 07 13:26

How often do you see a keyboard being held a few inches above the patient (as depicted with the MCA in the first figure in the article)? And if keyboards in clinical areas are being regularly disinfected throughout the NHS, how is it being done and does anyone know of any published evidence that the method is effective?


6

Smartcard?

23 Feb 07 14:23

There doesn't seem to be anywhere for a smartcard to go in this device, and there is no USB slot for a reader.

I guess these are only useful for non-CfH systems at the moment?


7

Battery Life

23 Feb 07 14:53

The battery issue will be crucial, as it would be a big annoyance to have a flat battery during a ward round or consultation. Some portable batteries lose their charge-holding capability, if re-charged before they are fully discharged. The tablet device must ideally have a battery which is capable of being trickle charged when not in use, without degradation of performance, so when removed from its charging station in the morning, after overnight charging, then a full 8 hours of battery life can be guaranteed for the day ahead.


8

Is it immersible?

chris@wheatley37.fsnet.co.uk

25 Feb 07 12:11

First thing I ask any medical company on seeing a new design: 1) is it immersible? 2) is it dropable for 5 feet?

If not, then its just another mis-designed medival product, of which there are thousands. I see these things in their hundreds, some only last a few days before being damaged, so we buy the rugged ones.

Yes they need to be Nurse proof and medic resistant.

Oh and This is nothing for Connecting for Health to crow about, Critical Care Technologists have been working with medical companies for years specifying products of this sort and spec. So glad they rush in and take all the credit for doing bugger all as usual with the national cock-up program Not that I'm bitter or anything you understand.


9

Important for bed side data access

sjrickaby@vodafone.net

25 Feb 07 14:32

Tablet PC’s are only meant to compliment the data access and collection tasks normally preformed on a workstation, not replace them. As such they can make a very important contribution. Some tasks, such as anaesthetics assessment, require access to the patents medical record in situ by the bed side. You can't expect clinicians to be able to remember everything in the patient’s record whilst interviewing the patient by the bed side.

As far as infection control goes, let’s face it, it’s impossible to sterilise every item of equipment on a ward. So a tablet PC that can be easily cleaned isn't much of a risk. How often are blood pressure monitors cleaned?


10

Community nurses should be the main focus of efforts, not hospitals

andrea.jones@southdowns.nhs.uk

26 Feb 07 10:11

Surely the main arena to (potentially) benefit from this initiative/these devices is in the community healthcare setting: community nurses, midwives etc. - around 20% of the nursing workforce. I do hope the suppliers doing the design work have thought of this and are involving appropriate users in their design work...?


11

Underwhelmed

ehealth@althaf.com

28 Feb 07 09:55

This is not ready for general rollout & if CfH try to spend our money on this, there will be an almighty uproar.

One Laptop Per Child can mange to design a much more robust system for $100 dollars, yet here we are considering spending the equivalent of $2000.

I looked into this for my portable voice recognition & clinical records software project 3 years ago.

The form factor is wrong, there being no need for a full sized laptop in most environments. Something with a 7" screen is plenty, surely. and the battery life needs to provide for a full days work, so atleast 14 hrs of non-stop work before a recharge is a must. And the connectivity is limited to WiFi, ignoring the widespread availability of GPRS or UMTS.

Something in the Nokia 770 form factor would be my pick bu there is a lot more to consider. Modifying a tablet PC is not the answer.


12

7" Screen

georgebrown@bulldoghome.com

28 Feb 07 10:45

IMHO - I'd view a 7" screen as a clinical risk in itself. Do we really think that a tired hospital doctor working a night shift can clearly see all of the required detail? In the case of prescribing - the inpatient prescription charts are already multisided A4 - and we should be surely trying to avoid introducing any further risk than already exists with a process?

The design of the application software also needs to be considered alongside the hardware used to run it.


13

Some more details...

01 Mar 07 18:48

Our hospital is one of six testing this product. We are primarily testing for use in out patient prescribing as the product has a bar code scanner built in.

Some more details, battery life is 3 hours. Cost in the U.S is just over $2000.


14

Both right

02 Mar 07 14:07

I have heard senior CfH people pontificate about how the doctor of the future would work - PDA in one hand, MCA device in the other. Whoops no hand to steady the patient as they fall.

For many clincial staff, a 7" or even smaller screen, with long battery life, lightweight and preferably pocketable system will be great for the 'results' on the run, which patients do I see next, where can I jot something down before I forget.

The larger screens will be needed for reviewing PACS images at the bedside, Drug Rounds etc.

But the NPfIT applications have a long way to go, and I have not seen a willingness to redesign the user interface to allow this when I have quizzed them.

To believe everything can be acomplished through one form factor is naiive, but that seems to be a foundation of much that is NPfIT.

Search
News Features Jobs Newsletters
latest forum posts
latest forum posts
Top jobs
More
Top jobs

Featured_recruiters
Featured_recruiters